Home
Contact Us
About Us
Subscribe
Subscribe
to access our searchable archive.
Login
Email
Password
Remember Me
Join Now
Forgot your password?
Recent Decisions
Earl Cadogan v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd; Howard De Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio and others
London Borough of Camden v The leaseholders of 37 flats at Grafton Way
Subject Areas
Service Charges
Administration Charges
Consultation Requirements
Costs
Appointment of a Manager
Right to Manage
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Legislation
Other
Insurance
Enfranchisement
Implied Terms
Expert Witnesses
Forfeiture
Right of First Refusal
About LVT Bulletin
About Us
About Arden Chambers
Subscribe
Contact Us
Archive
By LVT Issue
By Case Name
By Case Reference
By Subject
By Managing Agent
Search
Articles
SPORTELLI – V – CADOGAN
Legal
Disclaimer
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
<a href="http://www.statcounter.com/" _fcksavedurl="http://www.statcounter.com/" target="_blank"><img src="https://c21.statcounter.com/counter.php?sc_project=2213210&java=0&security=fb69c83a&invisible=1" _fcksavedurl="https://c21.statcounter.com/counter.php?sc_project=2213210&java=0&security=fb69c83a&invisible=1" alt="site stats" border="0"></a>
You are here:
Home
»
Insurance
Insurance
Latest Articles
Guy & others v Kinch and another
Apr 26, 2006
The main issue in this case was the insurance premiums. It was alleged that the amounts charged for insurance premiums were excessive at between £1800 and £2100 per annum and should have been in the region of £250 to £250 per annum.
Melford Park Management Co. Ltd v FHL (Nominees) Ltd
Mar 29, 2006
The applicant was the management company for an estate known as 1-26 Southdown Court, West Sussex. The respondent was the freeholder. The management company had been arranging insurance for the state until 2004. In 2004 the freeholder called upon the management company to insure through an agency and company nominated by them.