Home
Contact Us
About Us
Subscribe
Subscribe
to access our searchable archive.
Login
Email
Password
Remember Me
Join Now
Forgot your password?
Recent Decisions
Earl Cadogan v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd; Howard De Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio and others
London Borough of Camden v The leaseholders of 37 flats at Grafton Way
Subject Areas
Service Charges
Administration Charges
Consultation Requirements
Costs
Appointment of a Manager
Right to Manage
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Legislation
Other
Insurance
Enfranchisement
Implied Terms
Expert Witnesses
Forfeiture
Right of First Refusal
About LVT Bulletin
About Us
About Arden Chambers
Subscribe
Contact Us
Archive
By LVT Issue
By Case Name
By Case Reference
By Subject
By Managing Agent
Search
Articles
SPORTELLI – V – CADOGAN
Legal
Disclaimer
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
<a href="http://www.statcounter.com/" _fcksavedurl="http://www.statcounter.com/" target="_blank"><img src="https://c21.statcounter.com/counter.php?sc_project=2213210&java=0&security=fb69c83a&invisible=1" _fcksavedurl="https://c21.statcounter.com/counter.php?sc_project=2213210&java=0&security=fb69c83a&invisible=1" alt="site stats" border="0"></a>
You are here:
Home
»
Articles
Articles
Latest Articles
SPORTELLI – V – CADOGAN
Nov 21, 2006
Leasehold Reform Act valuations are traditionally carried out by the term and reversion method. For the term, the future income stream of the ground rent is capitalised and for the reversion, the vacant possession value at the valuation date is discounted by an annual compound interest rate, called the deferment rate, for the number of years from the valuation date to the termination date of the existing lease.