Subscribe to access our searchable archive.
Login


Join Now
Forgot your password?
Search
You are here: Home » Other

Other

Download Print Send a summary of this page to someone via email.

Latest Articles

  Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd v Silver and others
Dec 18, 2008

The properties in this appeal were two Grade 2 listed buildings, each requiring substantial remedial works. The initial round of works were completed in 2002 and were not satisfactory to either the residents or the freeholder. The residents association then instructed a chartered surveyor to comment on the standard of the works and, in due course, a further contract for works was issued. The landlord appointed the same chartered surveyor to act as contract administrators.
  Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Davis
May 2, 2008
The respondent leaseholder applied to the LVT under s.42 Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban development Act 1993 for a determination of the price payable for an extension of her lease.
  Hutchinson v London Green Ltd
Jul 6, 2006
The applicant leaseholders applied for a determination of the payability of their service charges.
  Gillibrand v Erkman
Jul 5, 2006
The landlord applied to the LVT for a determination of the liability of the leaseholder to pay various service charges. The landlord had purchased the property in 1999 but had only become the registered owner in 2005.
  Hutchinson and others v Bush Homes
Jul 4, 2006
The property in this case was a former public house which had been converted into 68 flats. As a condition of planning permission, 17 had been set aside for social housing and were held on long leases by the respondent landlord
  Marriott v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
Mar 1, 2006
The applicants applied to the LVT for a determination of their liability to pay service charges under s27A Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. They contended that the respondent had not complied with the consultation requirements of s20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
  Baliszewski v Harris
Dec 8, 2005
During the course of proceedings, it became clear that the landlord had kept for herself certain sums which were due to the tenant, but claimed to be able to do so as a set off against outstanding service charge payments.
  Chater et al v London Borough of Greenwich
Dec 7, 2005
The applicants challenged the validity of the s20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Notice served by the respondent. The notice had not contained any reference to various works that were subsequently done, such as repairing the soffit boards and other works totalling £2,000.
  London Borough of Camden v Chalcot Estate
Dec 6, 2005
Camden was the freehold owner of some 708 flats on the Chalcot estate, many of which were held on long leases under the various Right to Buy schemes. Camden wanted to enter into a long term “partnering agreement” with a private sector partner to carry out all works of repair and maintenance to the Estate for the next 15 years.